US Secretary of State, John Kerry Speech at the COP22

John Kerry at the COP22, eDesign Dynamics, Dr. Franco Monstalto
US Secretary of State, John Kerry Speech at the COP22

From the desk of Dr. Franco Montalto:

Dr. Montalto is at the 22nd Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC
Type: Meeting or Conference Organizer: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
Date: 07-18 Nov 2016 Location: Morocco (Marrakesh)

 

US Secretary of State, John Kerry, just gave an impassioned one hour talk about the path we’ve travelled and how much further there still is to go.

 

His message was similar to that of the other pragmatists/optimists/realists at this conference, namely that because of all that’s been done so far, we have a lot to feel encouraged about. But at the same time, we must remain aware that there is still a long way to go.

 

According to Kerry, the global community has never been more united in its resolve to accept the challenge posed by climate change and to act. The world came together last year at COP21 in Paris and committed to working towards reducing future global temperature increases to well under 2 degrees Celsius. Post-Paris, country’s doubled down and made their commitments binding at a very rapid pace. Though only 55 countries accounting for 55% of global emissions were required for the agreement to become binding, currently there are more than 109 countries collectively responsible for 75% of global greenhouse gas emissions, who have signed on to this historic pact. To resounding applause, Kerry reassured the audience that even in the United States, nobody should ever doubt that the majority of US citizens now believe that climate change is real and are ready to act.

 

But this year at COP22, the discussion is about implementation. Each nation is developing its own plan, tailored to its own circumstances, and according to its own abilities. It is an example of common, but differentiated responsibilities. Each country is taking advantage of the array of tools available to us and the most vulnerable countries are being helped along; actions taken in all countries can be ratcheted up in time, as nations are required to revisit their plans every five years. Citing recent efforts to promote carbon neutral growth in the international aviation industry which, if it were a nation, would be among the top dozen greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters in the world, Kerry cited progress outside of the Paris agreement. The Kigali Agreement is another example which, by imposing limits on use of chlorofluorocarbons, may alone have avoided 5 degrees of global temperature increase towards the goals agreed upon in Paris.

 

Kerry said he is encouraged by the growth in global renewable energy industry, citing a statistic that last year more than a half a million new solar panels were put up each day. Today, more of the world’s resources are invested in renewables than in fossil fuels, and millions are employed in clean energy work. Since 2008, wind power production has tripled and there has been a 30 fold increase in solar power production. China alone invested US$100 billion in renewable energy last year alone. These changes indicate that the market has adjusted; investments in clean energy, it is now clear, make good economic sense, and for that reason, the progress that has been made cannot and will not be reversed. According to Kerry, the renewable energy market is now the largest market the world has ever known.

 

The key question now that we’ve agreed to act globally is whether we have the will to change fast enough to avoid catastrophic damage. Here, Kerry said, time is not on our side. “At our current rate, we will not meet our goals.” Sixteen of the hottest years in recorded record have occurred since 2001, the last year that Marrakech hosted a COP. We’ve had record-breaking droughts, increased regularity in extreme weather, people displaced by climatic conditions, island states that have had to move their populations permanents, and other communities that know the same hard choices are to come.

 

Key in all of the progress that has been made so far has been leadership. Growth in the solar industry in the US, for example, was accelerated by tax credits made available by the Obama Administration. We need more of this leadership now if we are going to make the progress we need to make at the rate we need to make it. Calling out to all of the world’s leaders, Kerry said “What we do here and now matters. We don’t get a second chance. The consequences of failure are irreversible.” We are not on a “pre-ordained path to disaster…our choices matter.” All leaders need to do is to consider what has motivated the Pope and other faith leaders, presidents, business leaders, economists, the military, farmers, fisherman, activist, young people, and scientists to speak out to begin to understand the importance of the hard work that lies ahead of us.

 

A big part of the solution is going to be in honest accounting. Carbon intensive energy production may be cheap in the short term, but only when the economic equation ignores all of the downstream consequences of fossil fuel usage, for example, its impacts on agriculture, ecosystems, and health. Summer hospitalizations due to heat related asthma caused US taxpayers $US 55 billion last year. In the last three months, US taxpayers have also shelled out over $US 24 billion in damages associated with extreme events. The Louisiana flooding alone cause US taxpayers $10 billion this past August. Echoing a position I remember being articulated by former NASA climate scientist Jim Hanson during COP21 in Paris, Kerry said that one of the best tools we have available to us in achieving our goals is carbon pricing. This strategy can help us to find the cheapest ways to reduce emissions the most, further leveraging market forces in addressing this key international need.

Kerry ended his talk by saying that “climate change should not be a partisan issue” and that “nobody has the right to make decisions that affect billions of people based on ideology.” Citing Winston Churchill, he said that sometimes its not enough to do our best, rather, we have to do what is required.

 

Dr. Montalto is at the 22nd Conference of the Parties (COP22)

From the desk of Dr. Franco Montalto:

Dr. Montalto is at the 22nd Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC
Type: Meeting or Conference Organizer: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
Date: 07-18 Nov 2016 Location: Morocco (Marrakesh)

 

First positive message about US situation I've heard so far!

I'm sitting in a special side event sponsored by the US government to talk about the state of climate mitigation and adaptation in our country. The panelists are Brian Christopher Deese, senior advisor to President Barack Obama, Deborah Markowitz, Secretary of the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, and the Diane Holdorf, chief sustainability officer and vice president of environmental stewardship, health and safety for the Kellogg company.

Essentially the message was this: economic development and green house gas emissions are now officially decoupled, with business, states, and cities acting on their own. Deese started the session off by citing statistics: since 2008 economic growth is up 10%, carbon emissions are down 9%, and petroleum production is down by 2%. He claimed that it's the market and state and local leaders that are driving this "structural shift."

Beech was followed by Markowitz, who explained how this happened. In the years when Bush wouldn't participate in the Kyoto agreement, and when a republican congress wouldn't allow the US to lead at Copenhagen, states and local leaders filled the gap. Action was local despite inaction at the federal level, and that same trend will continue now. Currently 1 in 20 jobs in Vermont are in the solar industry. Markowitz reminded us that because the US has a federalist system, the states have quite a bit of autonomy and this works in our favor in the context of climate action. States and local governments have acted and will continue to do so.

Markowitz was followed by Holdorf, who said that her global company needs to compete in the global economy. Even if the US takes a hiatus in leadership at the federal level, Kellogg has its own internal benchmarks to meet, and global markets in other countries to consider. Her company has pledged to reduce its emissions by 65% by 2050, for example. To do that they need to consider their entire supply chain. And as a food producer, Kellogg is concerned with agriculture, with major impacts on water, energy and materials cycles. So from the business side, there's much more to consider than what one administration in one country is saying.

All three speakers ad the same fundamental message: the changes we need to meet our NDCs (Nationally Determined Contributions) are already underway and it's not because of the Clean Power Plan (which wouldn't go into effect until the 2020s anyway. The Western Climate Initiative and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative are already acting completely independent of the federal government.

In response to one attendee who said "well Vermont is here, but Texas isn't. Are we going to have a two speed system' in the US?" Keech jumped up and pointed out that Texas is leading the country in wind power right now! Climate action is happening and will continue to regardless of current change in administration!

Habitat III, UN Conference in Quito, Ecuador

Franco Monsalto, eDesign Dynamics Engineer, at the Habitat III United Nations Conference in Quito, Ecuador. October, 2016

Last week, Dr. Franco Montalto was introduced as the new Director of the North American Hub of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. The announcement took place at Habitat III, the United Nations Conference on Housing and Urban Development held in Quito, Ecuador October 17-20, 2016.

 
The Urban Climate Change Research Network
 is a network of more than 750 researchers from around the world studying the impacts of climate change in cities. The newly formed North American Hub will promote collaboration between UCCRN researchers and city leaders across North America. At Habitat III, Dr. Montalto presented preliminary ideas developed with other colleagues regarding the new Hub's structure and mission. 

 

HABITAT I, HABITAT II AND THE HABITAT AGENDA

The United Nations General Assembly convened the Habitat I Conference in Vancouver, Canada, in 1976, as governments began to recognize the need for sustainable human settlements and the consequences of rapid urbanization, especially in the developing world. At that time, urbanization and its impacts were barely considered by the international community, but the world was starting to witness the greatest and fastest migration of people into cities and towns in history as well as rising urban population through natural growth resulting from advances in medicine.

The Vancouver commitments were reconfirmed 20 years later, at the Habitat II Conference in Istanbul, Turkey. World leaders adopted the Habitat Agenda as a global plan of action for adequate shelter for all, with the notion of sustainable human settlements driving development in an urbanizing world.

Forty years later, there is a wide consensus that towns' and cities' structure, form, and functionality need to change as societies change. Cities have continued to expand outwards beyond their peri-urban areas, often due to weak urban planning, poor urban management, land regulation crises, and real estate speculation factors. It is now well understood that slums and related informal settlements are a spontaneous form of urbanization, consisting of a series of survival strategies by the urban poor, most borne out of poverty and exclusion.

Habitat III, and the New Urban Agenda as a result, represents an opportunity to make concrete the ideals of Habitat II in designing policies, planning urban spaces for all, and providing affordable urban services and utilities by looking to the cities as an incredible force of global development and facing the challenge of how to manage the urbanization process to improve citizens' lives

Franco Montalto, eDesign Dynamics Engineer, at the Habitat III United Nations Conference in Quito, Ecuador. October, 2016
Quito, the capital city of Ecuador, is located at 9,200 feet above sea level. With a population of 2.6 million people, Quito is the second most populous city in Ecuador, after Guayaquil. The historic centre of Quito has one of the largest, least-altered, and best-preserved historic centers in Latin America. Quito, along with Cracow, was the first World Cultural Heritage Sites declared by UNESCO in 1978.

Build Landscapes – Biannual Event in Turin, Italy

Build Landscapes, URBAN AND METROPOLITAN PARKS, eDesign Dynamics

Franco Montalto, PE, PhD, recently presented some of eDesign Dynamics' recent work at a biannual event organized by the Fondazione per l'Architettura di Torino in Turin, Italy.

This year's event took place between the 13th and 16th of October, and was called  Creare Paesaggi (Build Landscapes).

In his invited contribution, Dr. Montalto talked about multifunctional parks and other urban landscapes. He also showcased projects designed by EDD, and monitored by his research group at Drexel.

URBAN PARKS was the theme of the Biennale Create Landscapes 2016The urban park project is a key environmental renewal, urban and social tool through which you can rehabilitate degraded areas of the city and take action with respect to environmental hazards.It also has the ability to affect the quality of life of citizens, providing them with open spaces in response to social and cultural questions.Within metropolitan cities it is vital to ensure the environmental and recreational functions of the green, in the form of parks, it plays a very important role in spatial planning.In light of these considerations, one wonders, during the Biennale, how to implement and manage systems supra green spaces, with what new features you have to equip them and what new parameters should be developed to insert the green between services for the metropolitan population.

CAEE Professor Montalto Gives Training in Italy

eDesign Dynamics, Green Engineering, From July 11-15, 2016 CAEE Professor Dr. Franco Montalto, P.E. was a trainer at UNESCO World Water Assessment Program (WWAP) headquarters in Colombella, Italy.

Dr. Franco Montalto, P.E. was recently a trainer at UNESCO World Water Assessment Program (WWAP) headquarters in Colombella, Italy.  The training was entitled “Capacity Development on Water and Sustainable Development,” and was a follow up to the WWAP’s 2015 report "Water for a Sustainable World." It was attended by 20 water professionals from 14 different African countries.

Dr. Montalto kicked off the program with a group role play exercise inspired by Garrett Hardin’s seminal 1968 Science article, Tragedy of the Commons. The goal of exercise was to explore the challenges associated with implementing the UN’s recent Sustainable Development Goals through a “fishing game”. Dr. Montalto also taught the portion of the training that focused on Urban Water Planning and Management.

Professor Montalto’s Sustainable Water Resource Engineering Class in Venice

New York City Urban Field Station Science of the Living City Seminar

From June 8-18, 2016, CAEE Professor Dr. Franco Montalto, P.E. brought a group of 13 student to Venice, Italy as part of his Sustainable Water Resource Engineering class.

The theme of this year's class was Water and Jobs, the name also given to the 2016 World Water Development Report produced by World Water Assessment Program (WWAP). Since it is estimated that 3 out of 4 global jobs are water dependent, new approaches to water management can help to foster new forms of sustainable development. The group explored this theme with a focus on historical and contemporary water management strategies in Venice, a city of water.

After an introductory presentation by Dr. Angela Ortigara from WWAP, the trip began with a tour of the controversial Venice MOSE storm surge barrier project, followed immediately by technical presentations by some of its most vocal local critics.

The students then joined researchers from the University of Padua who are exploring strategies for engaging unemployed fisherman, refugees, and others in wetland restoration and river corridor restoration projects as part of the EU’s LIFE Vimine Project. The Drexel students collected water quality samples at the inlet and outlet of a tidal wetland in the Northern Venice lagoon in an effort to quantify its potential for improving water quality.

Other excursions included to Lazzaretto Nuovo, the city’s historical quarantine, to traditional fish farms in the Po Delta region, and to one of the region’s most historical flood control districts il Consorzio di Bonifica Delta Po Adige.

The project capstone was independent research conducted by the Drexel team on how various nature-based water management strategies could be incorporated into regional climate change adaptation planning in and around Venice. This work was presented to students and researchers at the IUAV University in Venice, an institution with which Drexel has an Erasmus + agreement to promote academic exchange on climate proofing cities. Water Resource Engineering

“Science of the Living City” Seminar for Green Infrastructure


New York City Urban Field Station Science of the Living City Seminar

Dr. Franco Montalto, President and Principal Engineer at eDesign Dynamics, was recently featured for the NYC Urban Field Station. Dr. Montalto spoke at the Arsenal for the "Science of the Living City" seminar series. 

"Reducing Water Pollution in a Dynamic World: The Critical Role of Green Infrastructure Investments in Enhancing the Resilience of Urban Landscapes" explored the potential role that multifunctional green infrastructure (GI) systems may be able to play in promoting urban resilience.

In the U.S. context, green infrastructure is primarily funded as a stormwater reduction measure. For this reason it must provide the service reliably, at a minimum. Research confirms that green infrastructure systems can reduce runoff at the site, block, and watershed scale, but much less is known about the other services these systems may provide in urban ecosystems, when they are strategically conceived, sited, and designed.

Because (GI) programs are typically being implemented in the context of adaptive management, the opportunity for practitioners, researchers, regulators, and community leaders to work together to pilot, monitor, and verify new green infrastructure configurations is upon us. Doing so requires flexibility, creativity, and the institutional willingness to attempt new things.

The New York City Urban Field Station “Science of the Living City” programs encompass all our educational efforts, affiliated partners, and special events.  Affiliates include scholars-in-residence, fellows, and interns. Events include seminars, brownbag lectures, workshops, and symposia.

Science of the Living City engages diverse partners across the city, speaks to a wide professional and public audience, and addresses a variety of pressing issues related to urban social ecology and quality of life in cities. The goal is to explore new knowledge and the applications and implications of this knowledge in the urban context as well as to expand overall environmental literacy.

See more about the Field Station, and their seminar series HERE >

 

ASLA New York 2016 Design Award Winners


Siteworks, the Trust for Public Land and eDesign Dynamics, wins ASLA New York 2016 Design Award

ASLA New York 2016 Design Award won by Siteworks, the Trust for Public Land and eDesign Dynamics for green playground design!

eDesign Dynamics is honored to have worked on such a tremendous project, transforming an asphalt lot to a state-of-the-art playground for NYC's Hells Kitchen community. The school, in an area almost devoid of parks, serves 600 kids, pre-K through 8th grade.  Designed with help from the school's students and built in partnership with New York City, the one-acre playground will include green infrastructure components that will allow the space to capture up to 700,000 gallons of stormwater runoff each year.

Congratulations to Siteworks, the Trust of Public Land and the P.S. 111 student consultants! 

See the full list of winning projects HERE >

Read more about our playground project HERE>

Photo credit: dnainfo.com

On February 27th, an interdisciplinary jury comprised of landscape architects and allied professionals from the Southern California Chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) convened to select winners of the 2016 ASLA New York Chapter Design Awards. Of the 55 award submissions, 18 projects received “Honor” or “Merit” designations. The awards will be presented at the ASLA-NY Design Awards Ceremony and Reception to be held on Thursday, April 7th, at the Center for Architecture in Manhattan.

 

The projects chosen represent excellence in professional accomplishment by ASLA New York members in five categories: General Design, Residential Design, Collaborative Design, Analysis/Planning/Research and Communications, and Un-Built Projects. This year’s jury responded favorably to the interesting collection of valuable ideas and research-based design solutions presented by award winners.  ASLA-NY 2016 President Celine Armstrong notes, that “the body of work represented by this year’s award recipients is very inspiring as these projects will bring joy to those visiting these landscapes and awareness to our profession. I am thankful to the landscape architects who continue to work tirelessly creating such beautiful works of art.”

 

- See more at: http://aslany.org/7152-2/?cbg_tz=300#sthash.RWJoenwR.dpuf

ROOFS ARE SPROUTING GREENERY


Dr. Montalto was recently quoted in an article on Philly.com about Philadelphia’s increasing population of green roofs and their many benefits and possibilities.

Across the city, the tops of buildings and parking lots are sprouting greenery like never before. The number of green roofs in Philadelphia has tripled since 2010, according to the Water Department, which tracks the roofs because they absorb storm-water runoff.

The city now has 111 green roofs, roughly 25 acres’ worth. An additional 64 roofs are in the queue. The completed ones range from a tiny poof of greenery atop a bus stop shelter - installed at 15th and Market Streets as an attention-getter in 2011 - to one of the latest and biggest, one-acre-plus of greenery at Cira Centre South in University City.

The region’s universities have not only been installing roofs, but also avidly studying them.

Among questions Drexel associate engineering professor Franco Montalto and his colleagues are pondering: Can we grow food crops, use native species (instead of desert-adapted sedum species), or create more biodiversity on green roofs in the urban Northeast? How differently do green roofs constructed on steeply sloped roofs perform? Can we adjust the design of the green roof to maximize its habitat value, such as attracting pollinators?

Read the full article at philly.com HERE >

Photo credit: DAVID SWANSON

LESSONS ON POST-RESILIENCE


Writing from Venice, Italy, Dr. Montalto was recently featured on The Nature of Cities. He spoke on coastal resiliency, from his own experience, living in this city where dealing with flood waters (acqua alta) is a fact of life.

Walking through the flooded streets is another interesting experience. Everyone slows down—tremendously. It wasn’t initially clear to me why this was happening. Without cars, there’s always a lot of ground to cover in this city, and the average Venetian typically moves at a healthy gait. Feeling confident in my new stivali, I continued to move at this pace only to find out within a few minutes that I was suffering death by a thousand drops. It seems that each fast step kicks a few drops into the top of your boot. You don’t feel those individual drops, but keep it up and in a few minutes, your socks are soaked. I slowed down, realizing that alas, pazienza, everyone around me was used to this. When there’s acqua alta, it’s OK to be late, or to change the plan, or to cancel appointments. (Though, ironically, not for first graders. My daughter’s new teacher was careful to tell me that acqua alta is not an excuse to be late for school.) Venetians have adapted to contemporary acqua alta the way they adapted to life in a foggy lagoon over a thousand years ago. Life goes on despite it.

Read the full article in The Nature of Cities HERE >

INTERVIEW WITH URBAN OMNIBUS


Eric Rothstein was profiled in Urban Omnibus in January 2015 in an article entitled “Mitigate, Design, Restore: A Conversation on Hydrology and Habitat.”

In the interview, Mr. Rothstein discusses how he chose his line of work, some of eDesign Dynamics projects and collaborations in NYC, and the benefits - and challenges - of green infrastructure and habitat restoration.

Read an excerpt from the interview below:

How does restoration in an urban area like New York City differ from elsewhere?

Traditional restoration work is often led by ecologists and biologists because they know what they need to create. But in the urban, post-industrial setting, the foundations of ecosystems are basically screwed up. These soils are high in nutrients and pH because of all the concrete, so they favor weedy species instead of our native species, which thrive in lower nutrient and more acidic soils. Then there is the poor water quality of the runoff, which includes oil, metals, and various other contaminants. Aligned with that is the issue of “flashy” hydrology: we get much more runoff and we get it a lot faster. So before you can establish a sustainable ecosystem, you need to fix the soils, the hydrologic regime, and the water quality.

Do you have any particular hopes for further integration of ecological ideas into urban development?

To be truly green would be to design everything so that on balance it has a net positive effect on the planet. It’s really hard to offset the negative impact of a building, because of all the materials brought in and the pollution caused by construction and people living there. Most people say that the next best step is to do everything that’s feasible within the budget to have as little an impact as possible. I still struggle with the building scale. With park development, however, you’re taking something with no habitat value and creating both that value and an amenity for the community.

 The full article can be found HERE >

 

1 4 5 6 7 8 9